Research

Articles

Scenario's for Sudan's future, Revisted

09 Aug 2010 - 16:21

In this recent Peace Brief, written by Jon Temin, a senior program officer at USIP, and Jaïr van der Lijn, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael Institute, both of whom focus much of their work on Sudan, the following main conclusions were drawn:

  • Many of the post-referendum scenarios in Sudan envisioned by the U.S. Institute of Peace and Clingendael Institute one year ago remain plausible today, less than six months prior to the referendum
  • While recent progress on post-referendum arrangements is encouraging, a return to a North-South civil war is possible, and there is reason to be concerned about the stability of both states if the outcome of the referendum is secession.
  • As the referendum approaches, it will be important for the South to develop a stronger sense of cohesion and common purpose given the uncertain and unprecedented environment following the vote.
  • Productively engaging the opposition (armed and unarmed), incorporating marginalized ethnic and tribal groups into power structures, decentralizing authority, more equitably sharing resources, and refraining from supporting armed opposition against rivals are important principles for both parties to adhere to in any recipe for peace and stability