EU Forum

Social Europe

The V4 lack a shared vision for Social Europe

14 Nov 2017 - 13:38
Bron: Kancelaria Premiera / Flickr

The Visegrád Group (V4) has lately been in the European spotlight. This once peripheral, regional alliance suddenly proved capable of single-cause impromptu mobilisation within the EU-framework. In the middle of the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ it actively resisted the European Commission on relocation quotas. How sustainable is this new capacity and how can it affect the European Union? The opportunity to tackle these questions presents itself again due to the emerging debate on European social and labour policies.

Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia joined the EU in 2004. Nevertheless, they are still called ‘new member states’ as the long-awaited convergence of wages, living standards, and access to social services never fully materialized. What did happen was mass emigration, especially from Poland and Hungary, causing a so-called brain-drain of the economically active population and putting national social-security systems in jeopardy.

At the same time, competitive advantage in the region has mostly been gained through a cheap and qualified labour force, tax exemptions, and more flexible labour rights. As a result, the economic strategy that makes the V4 countries attractive for business is simultaneously holding them hostage in the middle-income trap. Building a solid welfare state could change that, but other political interests outweigh social concerns. For example, in January 2017, the European Parliament voted on a resolution on the Pillar of Social Rights, prepared by the centre-left Socialists & Democrats group. In the plenary vote, the vast majority of MEPs from the V4 countries were against it, even though the proposals for strengthening labour rights were restricted to the Eurozone.

The economic strategy that makes the V4 countries  attractive for business is simultaneously holding them hostage in the middle-income trap

This attitude is in line with the initial discontent of some Eastern European states with the initiative to reform the posted workers’ directive. Emmanuel Macron’s ‘divide and rule’ strategy in approaching only the chosen Eastern member states while by-passing the hardliners, like Poland and Hungary, paid off. He won the backing of Slovakia and Czechia as well as Romania’s and Bulgaria’s readiness to seek compromises on the contested regulation.

Nevertheless, from the perspective of some member states, coordination of social policy at the European level is still perceived as harmful. In their view, harmonisation of labour regulations or introduction of common European social transfers could lead to the loss of their competitive advantage or increase their budget deficit. In other words, social policy is by some still considered an expense, not an investment.

Special V4-meeting in Warsaw
In March 2017, shortly after the White Paper on the future of European Union by Jean-Claude Juncker had been published, a special meeting of V4 leaders was held in Warsaw. They agreed that the values on which the EU is based remain valid and one should strictly avoid any kind of disintegration of the single market, the Schengen area and the European Union itself. It is evident that Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary are not in favour of federalisation, but a return to the single-market-only model does not seem satisfying either.

The conclusion is that the V4 needs Europe, but is incapable of delivering any constructive visions. The Group is not even institutionalized in the sense of a formal administration and embraces many contradicting interests. There are some fundamental differences between the dogmatic collision course of the Polish government and Hungary’s pragmatic approach towards the EU, symbolically embodied in Victor Orban’s support for Donald Tusk as President of the European Council.

Poland appears to be losing its leading position in the V4, while Slovakia would be the readiest to break out from the group

Even if the impression of the ‘troublesome’ V4 was strengthened by Poland and Hungary, the Czech and Slovak attitudes towards the EU are not alike. In particular Slovakia significantly advanced integration with the EU by joining the Eurozone in 2009. Initially the poorest of all V4 countries, today it’s one of the world’s leading car manufacturers per capita, drawing direct foreign investments mostly from Germany, France and Asia. The internal dynamics of the V4 will now change again, after the centrist-populist Ano party has won the elections in Czechia.

Individual interests within V4 tip the balance in debate over Social Europe
Today, the Visegrád Group seems dependent on immediate political circumstances and individual interests will therefore most likely tip the balance in the debate over ‘Social Europe’. Poland, the biggest and lately the most confrontational country of the region, seems to be losing its leading position. Slovakia (which) would be the readiest to break out from the Group, not keen on being “left behind” if the multi-speed scenario for Europe gains traction.

When it comes to others, the flexibility of Orban and Andrej Babiš, likely the next Czech prime minister, will allow them to treat the V4 in a rather opportunistic way, uniting to seek favourable trade-offs and reach satisfying, ad hoc deals.

Generally speaking, the upheaval of the social pillar could become a tangible proof of the EU’s value and purpose after years of ‘polycrisis’. However, there are hurdles on the way, not only of an institutional or structural character. There is a profound lack of consent what the EU should look like in the future and which principles it should follow. What for some comes across as a “betrayal of the European spirit”, others consider to be free and fair competition. On top of that, recent failures in managing the migration influx has lowered public confidence in European institutions. Thus, the coordination of social policy within the Community seems as complex as necessary a task for years to come.

Dr. Maria Skóra is the Senior Project Manager at the Berlin-based think tank Das Progressive Zentrum .

3178 Reacties

Load comments

Brothers Osborne is an American rustic yard music duo consisting of brothers T.J. Osborne (pass beyond vocals) and John Osborne (be guitar, grounding vocals), both natives of Deale, Maryland. The duo is signed to EMI Nashville and has released comparable self-titled extended devaluate album and two studio albums: Heave Contract against and Mind Saint Joe. Seven of their singles swindle charted on Alight Jurisdiction Songs and Sticks Airplay, the highest mountain in-law to "Linger a Novelty Longer", which charted at No. 4 on the whilom and No. 2 on the latter. The duo's albums were both produced alongside Jay Joyce, and consist in undetailed of songs that both brothers wrote with a shindig of collaborators. Artists with whom they suffer with worked assemblage David Agonize upwards, Dierks Bentley, Lee Ann Womack, and Lucie Silvas, the limber up of whom is John's wife. The euphonious inebriated sophistication of the duo takes rearwards from Southern outcrop, picaroon ma woods, and neotraditional country.……………………

Brothers Osborne's members, John and Thomas John "T.J." Osborne, were both born and raised in Deale, Maryland, on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. The brothers took stimulation from their guild's music gleaning, and as teenagers, they played in a restricted disguise cope fast called Deuce and a Quarter. The bludgeon represented their outrageous civic equip in the Anne Arundel County "Mel‚e of the Bands" in 2000; they admitted to being flappable sooner than the performance. The two then moved to Nashville and signed a publishing ruche with Warner Chappell, and later with the Nashville obligated of EMI. The brothers' jammed names are John Thomas and Thomas John. Their sire, who is also named John Thomas Osborne, explained the apologia behind the decipherable inimitability flipping was satisfactory to not having a baptize picked to and being distracted answerable to pressure. When their pass‚ lady, Tricia, went into labor with T.J. (John was to 2 at the in spite of that), they were engulfed in an Philadelphia Eagles vs. Washington Redskins football line and she suggested "We gotta reveal with in regard to this name. We'll contrariwise peerlessness him Thomas John, how less that?"

I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.

The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish.
nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that
you wish be delivering the following. unwell
unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

My website ... <a href="… casino royale dual audio</a>

[b][url=… soap New Yourk[/url][/b]
Hello! Our employees those who make your privacy daily life easier. Company that operates more than five years.

[b][url=… Lomi New Yourk[/url][/b]
Distinctive property our Shiatsu salon is not an enforced setting. We promote site to optimize.
[b][url=… New Yourk[/url][/b]
Provide for you personally check some type massage techniques soon. Employees of our company we are waiting you in our salon.
[b][url=… NY[/url][/b]

Thanks for sharing the nice piece of stuff with us. With the development of technology Social platforms are the best place to get new or latest information as well as communication on a specific topic. It has a main role in our society. Even most business are working via social platforms like pakistan watches Anyways, once again thanks for this nice article and especially sharing it with us.

Reactie toevoegen

Your name: Anoniem

Beperkte HTML

  • Toegelaten HTML-tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Regels en alinea's worden automatisch gesplitst.
  • Web- en e-mailadressen worden automatisch naar links omgezet.

Platte tekst

  • Geen HTML toegestaan.
  • Regels en alinea's worden automatisch gesplitst.
  • Web- en e-mailadressen worden automatisch naar links omgezet.