The survey designed for this study aimed to deliver against two objectives to complement the qualitative analysis in this report:

1)
To understand citizens’ perception of security and protection providers in their direct surroundings and at municipal level
2)
To conduct a comparative analysis of local security governance across different municipalities in Libya.


Municipality selection
was done on the basis of:

1)
Geography (the survey was designed to target municipalities in the east, west and south of the country)
2)
Different governance modalities (tribal, military and militia)
3)
Availability and interest of local partners (i.e. accessibility and security situation).


Operationalisation of security concepts
was put into place via sets of questions and indicators used to assess citizens’ perceptions of security.

Table 1
List of survey questions

Security concept

List of questions

General security situation in municipality

1.
Available services and facilities
2.
Types of safety threats
3.
Feelings of safety at different times and locations

Violence and protection dynamics

1.
Main victims of violence
2.
Main perpetrators of violence
3.
Main protection providers
4.
Main groups receiving protection

Security actors in the municipality

1.
Actors in control of the municipality
2.
Actors in control of infrastructure
3.
Actors in control of law and order
4.
Trust towards different actors
5.
Protection sought from different actors

Security competitiveness between actors in the municipality

1.
Degree of competition/cooperation between different actors
2.
Frequency of confrontations between different actors

The survey questions were customised to reflect the local security constellation of each municipality. The lists of actors included were based on the security constellation of the municipality when the survey was conducted (mid-2017). To customise the survey for each municipality, we used a combination of literature review and desk research, and consultation with local partners from the municipality. The survey is yet to be carried out in the east of the country due to inaccessibility.

Instructions on the survey were shared with our local partners in a meeting in August 2017 in Tunis organised by Clingendael staff. The instruction workshop was followed up with a written manual and instruction videos for easy reference. Interim survey findings and experiences with the survey approach were shared and discussed in a workshop with Libyan partners in Tunis in February 2018.

The survey was conducted at household level through face-to-face interviews with a stratified convenience sample of respondents with the safety for both enumerator and respondent taken into consideration. To ensure a minimal degree of representativeness, the survey enumerators were asked to conduct surveys in four different neighbourhoods in their municipality: two neighbourhoods that were generally regarded as secure and two neighbourhoods generally regarded as insecure. In addition, enumerators were asked to select different types of respondents in each neighbourhood: at least one man and one woman, at least one young person and one elderly person, and members of all relevant ethnic groups.

All respondents were kept anonymous. Enumerators could submit the surveys through an online survey tool, audio recording or hard copy.

Table 2
Survey sample*

Municipality

Local partner

Number of respondents

Date of completion

Zawiyah

Women are Coming – Libya

19

7/4/2018

Tripoli

Al Rahma

24

5/2/2018

Sabratha

Brothers without Borders for Humanitarian Work

6

9/3/2018

Misrata

Human Rights Organization for the Consolidation of Constitutional Justice

28

20/4/2018

Ghat

Individual contractor

12

15/5/2018

Gharyan

Individual contractor

11

7/2/2018

Ghadames

Ghadames Youth – Ghadames Eyes Organization

20

25/4/2018

Aziziyah

Individual contractor

24

18/5/2018

* Changes in the local security situation and the (in)activity of local partners account for the differences in number of respondents between municipalities. The survey process is ongoing. Partners can continue submitting survey data, which will be uploaded to the Clingendael website.

Legends

Table 3
Categories of armed groups[63]

Name

Description

GNA

Armed forces strongly affiliated with the Government of National Accord. They include, among others, the Presidential Guards, Saiqa Forces and the Special Deterrence Forces.

LNA

The Libyan National Army is a loose coalition of armed forces that vary in size and resources under the leadership of Major-General Khalifa Haftar. The LNA is a self-styled military force and not the nation’s regular army.

Security directorate

Security directorates (mudiriyat al-aman) were established under the previous regime. They can be understood as the state’s police force. Although they are relatively weak, security directorates enjoy local legitimacy.

Local forces

Forces comprised of volunteers who provide security for their own community. This category includes tribal forces and local neighbourhood watch groups.

Armed groups

Armed groups (including militias) that are relatively powerful. Depending on the local context, they provide security and/or are perceived as a threat. Examples include the Zintan Military Council, Tebu Armed Groups and Tripoli Revolutionary Brigade, among many others.

Smuggling groups

Armed groups whose primary activity is the smuggling of people and goods. This category includes, for example, Al-Dabashi, Al-Zawaiy and Al-Hanish groups.

Table 4
Categories of insecurity

 

Theft

Crime of stealing material belongings

Destruction, loss

Damaging material belongings beyond repair (including bombing)

Murder

Unlawful premediated killing of human being(s)

Punishment of opponents

The punishment of individuals or groups who oppose the authority of main power holder in the municipality

Violence against civilians

Violence by armed actors against (a group of) unarmed civilians

Physical violence

Physical injuries to the individual following situational threats

External threats

Threat by armed external actors (i.e. not from the municipality)

Sexual abuse

Unwanted sexual contact

This legend categorises the main security actors as included in the survey. The list is not exhaustive, nor is every category represented in each municipality.